Identity of our Father

In this series of studies, we are using language to identify our Intelligent Designer. We are using the Intelligent Designer of the Hebrew people to illustrate HOW the language of an Intelligent Designer can be observed among cultures from the very beginning to the present day. We have shown a link between the languages of Yahuah, Adam, Noach (Noah), Abraham and Moshe (Moses) by showing evidence that Yahuah has effectively communicated with each one. We are also using the ancient Hebrew pictographic language to decipher meanings of words in the Hebrew texts of Bibles and Tanakhs. We have accomplished this in three essential steps:

1. We determine the meanings of the individual letters themselves found in the Hebrew word.
2. We combine those definitions to determine the overall meaning of the word;
3. We validate and verify the definition within the context of the Hebrew writings.

This evidence proves that the Hebrew writings of Moshe (Moses) were written in the ancient Hebrew pictographic language originally and that the Hebrew language itself came from this Alephbet. We have provided evidence that this language written and spoken existed at the time of the Prophet Moshe (Moses) from evidence found at the Serabit El-Khadim Egyptian mining site.

Technically, Yahuah is not a “Hebrew” so His Language could not really be called “Hebrew”. His Language is spoken and written BY the Hebrew people. It was preserved in their lineages. In this study, we are going to show a common thread related to the Language of the Intelligent Designer of the Hebrew people using reliable, credible evidence by defining the word “Hebrew” itself.

Yahuah created Adam to speak His Language. Adam and Chavah (Eve) taught this language to their offspring and their sons and daughters taught it to their offspring. Ten generations later, Noach (Noah) was born. He was also taught the Language of our Creator. In this testimony, Yahuah is giving instructions to Noach.

Noach (Noah) heard and understood the instructions given by Yahuah because he did exactly what he was instructed to do. He understood Yahuah’s language. Noach taught his sons to speak, read and write in this language. Then, they taught their sons and so forth. Testimony says that Shem, the son of Noach (Noah), begat Arphaxad who begat Salah who begat Eber, the father of the Hebrew people.

“Eber” is the root of the word, “Hebrew”. Following is the name “Eber” as it appears in the above passage in modern Hebrew as well as the ancient pictographic Hebrew language. We have included the corresponding English letters from the name “Eber”. They appear backwards because Hebrew is read from right to left.

עבר

RB[

RBE

We are going to define this word using the ancient Hebrew pictographic language and verify it with the context of passages in which it occurs. The Hebrew word, “Eber” includes the letters “ayin, bet and resh” in that order. “Jeff Benner does not define names specifically in The Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible but he does define the roots that form them. The three-lettered root that forms the name, “Eber” is defined the following way:

All words that come from that root are related in meaning because they use the same “pictures” to define them. The two-lettered root of this word is defined by The Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible written by Jeff A. Benner as:

We can see this definition in the pictographic language. But how does grain relate to the concept of “crossing over”? Let’s investigate further by defining the individual letters in the word ourselves.

• The “ayin” is a picture of an eye. This letter is a reference to the anything that can be done with the eye, physically or spiritually. This letter means “see, watch, shade, know or knowledge, perceive”. The English letter “O” is derived from this letter. The letter “ayin” most likely was originally an “O” sound.
• The “beyt” is a picture of a nomadic tent meaning “house, family or inside”. The family lives “inside” the tent or house. Grains of the same type are in the same “plant family”.
• The letter “resh” is the profile of a man’s head. This is pretty obvious. The “resh” means the head of man, chief, first, top, beginning, inheritor. Grains produce a stalk with seeds at the top. The grain is the “head” of the stalk or the “top”. We can see the concept of a “family of heads” or a “family of men and women” who reside inside the tent. This definition can apply to the heads of grains or the heads of a family.

Here are the pictures associated with the ancient Hebrew pictographic language:

In its most basic sense, these words mean “see family of heads”. This could be a reference to grains across the way or seeing other people prospering in the lands across the way.

Our English word “over” is linked to “Eber”. This link is called an “Edenic Connection”. It demonstrates a direct connection to the language spoken in the Garden of Eden. The patriarch Eber was the fourteenth generation from Adam. In modern-Hebrew, the letter “beyt” can have a “B” or a “V” sound. Here is an illustration illustrating the connection between “Eber” and the English word “Over”:

Essentially, these words are the same in English and Hebrew and they have the same meaning as well. Etymonline provides the etymology of the English word “over”:

The English word “over” has a similar definition as the Hebrew word “Eber”. We have also provided a chart showing the relationship between the letter “ayin” and the English letter “O”. The English language is based upon the Greek alphabet. Modern English shows a direct link to the Language of Eden. https://www.ancient-hebrew.org/ancient-alphabet/ayin.htm

Ancient Hebrew is very concrete. “Eber” has the following meaning based on the ancient Hebrew pictographic language:

See Family of Heads: a man could see grains beyond that could feed his flocks so he crosses over to the other side with his flocks. They had depleted the fields where they were and were hungry. Once they got to the other side, they ate, filled their bellies and were content.

This concept is related to the root word for “Noach”. The Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible said “Noach” could be defined as, “The shepherd would guide his flock to a place of water. Here is water for drinking as well as green grass for pasturing. Once the flock arrives, they are free to rest after the long journey. A guided journey to a place of rest. A sigh of rest.” https://www.ancient-hebrew.org/ahlb/nun.html#5118

“Noach” guided his flock to the “other side” of the flood. The violence in the earth had been quelled. The “family of heads” were able to rest and graze safely. On the Ark, Noach literally carried the “family heads” of every species. (Bereshith/Genesis 6:9-9:16).

Likewise, Moshe (Moses) guided his flock to the “other side” of the Red Sea during the exodus from Egypt. Their enemies had been destroyed. The “family of heads” were able to rest and live safely on the other side. (Shemoth/Exodus 14:1-31).

Yahusha (Joshua) Son of Nun guided his flock to the “other side” of the Yarden (Jordan) River into the land of promise. The “family of heads” ate the “family of heads” or “grains” on the other side of the Yarden River. The “family of heads” inherited the land of promise and lived safely on the other side for a period of time. (Yahusha/Joshua 3:1-4:24). Here is a passage regarding this event that uses the Hebrew word “Eber”:

These three events establish a pattern. All of them involved “crossing over” a body of water to a place of safety and rest.

1. Crossing over the flood waters that consumed the whole earth
2. Crossing over the Red Sea to the other side
3. Crossing over the Yarden River to the land of promise

The Hebrew word “Eber” could also mean the following:

Know Inside Man: Testimony says Yahuah lives inside the Garden of Eden. We live on the outside of the Garden of Eden. The “ayin” can mean something that is known in the mind or perceived by the spiritual eye. Testimony says the “Spirit” from Yahuah dwells inside of a man or woman.

When the Spirit from Yahuah dwells inside an individual, He “knows” them. The inside man is with the Spirit of Yahuah Elohiym. They are together. This means the inside man has “crossed-over” to the other side and is with Yahuah. Here is an illustration:

The Garden of Eden is a place of delight and abundant in food. Testimony also says that it contains the Tree of Life which allows one to live forever. The Presence of His Spirit inside a man or woman is the evidence that one has successfully “crossed-over” to the other side. The “spiritual” manifestation occurs first followed by the physical manifestation. Consider the following testimony from Shaul of Tarsus (Paul):

We know that there is a chasm that separates people from Yahuah. This is alluded to in the following testimony:

The Hebrew word translated as “pass-through” is the Hebrew word “Eber” which means “cross-over to the other side”. Here are four occurrences of “Eber” in the Hebrew writings that confirm this definition.

This word describes places on the other side of a river, beyond the river or over the Yarden (Jordan) river. It is the action of going over to the other side. It also describes an individual who has crossed-over the chasm and is dwelling with Yahuah on the other side. In the resurrection, the Spirit of Yahuah Elohiym who dwells in them will resurrect them back to life. At this point their physical bodies can “cross-over” to the other side.

All definitions of “Eber” aim to preserve life. It is this idea of crossing-over from a less-desirable place to a place that is much more desirable. It is a place of comfort, rest and delight. It is a place where people are preserved from their enemies or violence. The definition from the ancient Hebrew pictographic Alephbet is in alignment with the context of scripture.

So far in this series, we have defined the following words using the ancient Hebrew pictographic Alephbet: Noach, Adam, Ketub and Eber. We have been able to piece together the definitions of each one using the pictographic letters. We have verified the meanings of these words with the context of scripture.

For example, if the ancient Hebrew pictographic letters illustrated the Hebrew word “Eber” meant “hit,” we could place the word “hit” in the place where the word “Eber” occurs and we could see that it clearly would not fit the context of the passage. Here is an example in a passage we quoted previously.

• And Yahusha said, Alas, O Adonai Yahuah, why have you at all brought this people hit [H5674] Yarden, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to destroy us? Would to Elohiym we had been content, and dwelt on the hit [H5676] Jordan! (Yahusha/Joshua 7:7)

This passage does not make sense using the word “hit”. We would know that the Hebrew word “Eber” did not originally mean “hit” when the Prophet Moshe wrote this account. We would have to come to the conclusion that the ancient Hebrew pictographic language was not the language spoken by the Prophet Moshe or our Intelligent Designer. However, this is not the case. The definitions obtained by reviewing the ancient pictographic letters fit within the context of every Hebrew word we have defined thus far. This is the case over and over again.

Each one of these Hebrew words that we have defined is a single witness verifying that ancient Hebrew pictographic language was the written language used by the Prophet Moshe to write his accounts. This is further verified by carvings in the Serabit El-Khadim mining site dated to 1446 BCE (Before the Common Era). Words in our own modern-day languages are linked to these letters written in those caves and even definitions have been preserved. This is solid reliable evidence that we can see with our own eyes.